The Liberal Denial Grows

With the desperate help of the L-MSM, the Party of Delusion has decided to embrace the Clinton Denial even further.

Which has produced sincere Liberal Losses since 1992...

Ironically, Hillary Rodham Clinton is defending her angry Hubby, (no surprise), after he just debased her decision to vote, endorse, approve, authorize the Operation Iraqi Freedom.

"If they want to talk about Iraq, say what they really want about Iraq..."

Do you mean oil Mr. Clinton? Are you too cowardly, to bluntly make the Code Pinky charge of 'no war for oil' ? Where is your Halliburton Bill? Intern got your tongue?

Hillary was 2nd IN COMMAND of what she now oddly calls 'his administration'. And 'no', sorry Ms. Rodham, even the silly 9-11 Commission indicated you were inept, weak, misguided, (actually negligent), facing the rise of Radical Muslim Militancy.

"We were not left a comprehensive strategy to fight al Qaeda," Secretary of State Condi Rice.

This has sincere political importance, in this poster's humble opinion, because Democrats are advocating a return to the folly of the 1990's.

Perhaps, some misguided internal polling, mistakenly led the Liberal Partisans into believing Bill's ugly reputation is now attractive. Maybe this is simply desperation...

However, Democrat campaign messages, attempting to 'Blame Bush' again, and diminish the serious threat of Radical Islamic Terrorism, are now coupled with a renewed embrace of the unethical Clinton past.

Do they ever offer something constructive?

For example, Bill's appearance for Claire "George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black" McCaskill in St. Louis:

"They could give their crowd shovelfuls of money, as long as they kept America scared," Clinton said. "They think government for special interests is good."

Do they realize, Bill Clinton couldn't even save Joe Lieberman?

Maybe, after declaring the need for tax increases, they can advocate to 'kill' the Patriot Act, and ask Bill Clinton to run for President again...

The impressive IAN of HOT AIR: “my husband did a great job”

IAN also posted Hillary's Husband waving the finger at the late Peter Jennings: 'Clinton Points Finger At Jennings'

(* Note Bill saying he never disgraced this Country publicly? He never let the American People down? Never lied about his job? Who are 'you people' Mr. Clinton?)

*** BIG UPDATE:
Many of this posters favorite Conservative Pundits, Bloggers, etc., feel the need to show their moral decency, and rise above the debate about the past.

The mighty Captain will reference the Clinton Issue as useless:
The Washington Post Fact-Checks A Useless Debate

Mr. Morrissey is indeed one of the finest...
(Knowing the Captain, and his outstanding
record, he is most likely correct again).

But this poster humbly believes our history, is essential to determining policy, focus, resolve, for our future. Even those ugly partisan confrontations. There is little doubt, the negligence of the 1990's failed to address the growing threats we face today.

The current Democrat Party is advocating a return to that past. These Liberals are now using the Clinton Administration as an advertisement for their agenda (exhibited above), aided by their supporters in the MSM.

Sadly, the Democrat Partisans believe in ending the needed Patriot Act, stopping surveillance of Terrorists, abandoning a growing Democracy in Iraq, appeasing Despots who support terrorism, etc...

In fact, the modern DNC, has displayed endless efforts to undermine our fight and weaken our resolve in the GWOT for their own personal political gain, which ultimately threatens our Security.

The issue is clear, do we return to the days of denial, represented and advocated by William J. Clinton and the Democrat Partisans, or do we continue to fight on, with the policy of the current Administration?

The Democrats, including Bill Clinton, have made this the primary debate, and this poster would gladly welcome a different one. Who wouldn't want a more constructive discussion? But the Liberal Partisans are not interested, or capable, of this more admirable direction. They are still slandering the rationale, for using force to remove a monster named Saddam, even when they voted for it.

This poster firmly believes in the aggressive rebuke of terrorists. Even advocated for a greater confrontation of the Islamic Community to confront the insane, oppressive, violence being fostered within their ranks.

How can I not have the same conviction at home in the domestic arena? We must strongly oppose any unethical effort to slander those serving our political interest, especially when it weakens the security of the American Public.

If the Clinton Negligence were more vigirously challenged in our past, we may have been more prepared to deal with the threats we face today. Thus, aggressively opposing the same corrupt offerings presented now, can aid Our Nation for the future.