Some worry about the future, but this poster feels quite optimistic seeing the impressive insight of so many strong, intelligent, resolved, American Women.
The Democrat Party seems to advocate for illegal immigration and the complete removal of all borders.
John Kerry's 'global test', is a vivid symbol for the mindless Liberal advocation of the global community, without regard to the concerning convictions, practices, beliefs, systems, foreign to the fine USA.
Even with the Democrat Partisan folly, immigration remains a complex emotional issue, which has been negligected in this Country for decades.
Mr. Kennedy is upset about another victory for President GW Bush and our Country in the GWOT, with the passage of a Detainee Interrogation Bill.
Bill Clinton made a similar baseless accusation as well. Suggesting Republicans are not motiviated by serious conviction, but are engaged in pure political manipulation. The husband of Hillary Rodham, attempted to brand the genuine advocation for the firm defense of this fine Nation, as merely being 'scare' tactics.
There is nothing more amusing these days, than the Liberal obsession with sanctimony.
Could they be engaged in the art of 'Projection'?
"The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt."
Regarless of the motive, this poster is truly thankful for the Republican Majority in the House and Senate, and this fine President...
It remains one of the problems this Country is confronted with, the intentional misrepresentation of information, by the Nation's Larger Media Establishments.
Everyone understands mistakes, even possessing a poor perception, but the unethical manipulation of the facts by Liberal Partisans in the Press, is quite dangerous for all Americans.
With the desperate help of the L-MSM, the Party of Delusion has decided to embrace the Clinton Denial even further.
Which has produced sincere Liberal Losses since 1992...
Ironically, Hillary Rodham Clinton is defending her angry Hubby, (no surprise), after he just debased her decision to vote, endorse, approve, authorize the Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Do you mean oil Mr. Clinton? Are you too cowardly, to bluntly make the Code Pinky charge of 'no war for oil' ? Where is your Halliburton Bill? Intern got your tongue?
Hillary was 2nd IN COMMAND of what she now oddly calls 'his administration'. And 'no', sorry Ms. Rodham, even the silly 9-11 Commission indicated you were inept, weak, misguided, (actually negligent), facing the rise of Radical Muslim Militancy.
This has sincere political importance, in this poster's humble opinion, because Democrats are advocating a return to the folly of the 1990's.
Perhaps, some misguided internal polling, mistakenly led the Liberal Partisans into believing Bill's ugly reputation is now attractive. Maybe this is simply desperation...
However, Democrat campaign messages, attempting to 'Blame Bush' again, and diminish the serious threat of Radical Islamic Terrorism, are now coupled with a renewed embrace of the unethical Clinton past.
Do they ever offer something constructive?
For example, Bill's appearance for Claire "George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black" McCaskill in St. Louis:
"They could give their crowd shovelfuls of money, as long as they kept America scared," Clinton said. "They think government for special interests is good."
(* Note Bill saying he never disgraced this Country publicly? He never let the American People down? Never lied about his job? Who are 'you people' Mr. Clinton?)
*** BIG UPDATE: Many of this posters favorite Conservative Pundits, Bloggers, etc., feel the need to show their moral decency, and rise above the debate about the past.
Mr. Morrissey is indeed one of the finest... (Knowing the Captain, and his outstanding record, he is most likely correct again).
But this poster humbly believes our history, is essential to determining policy, focus, resolve, for our future. Even those ugly partisan confrontations. There is little doubt, the negligence of the 1990's failed to address the growing threats we face today.
The current Democrat Party is advocating a return to that past. These Liberals are now using the Clinton Administration as an advertisement for their agenda (exhibited above), aided by their supporters in the MSM.
Sadly, the Democrat Partisans believe in ending the needed Patriot Act, stopping surveillance of Terrorists, abandoning a growing Democracy in Iraq, appeasing Despots who support terrorism, etc...
In fact, the modern DNC, has displayed endless efforts to undermine our fight and weaken our resolve in the GWOT for their own personal political gain, which ultimately threatens our Security.
The issue is clear, do we return to the days of denial, represented and advocated by William J. Clinton and the Democrat Partisans, or do we continue to fight on, with the policy of the current Administration?
The Democrats, including Bill Clinton, have made this the primary debate, and this poster would gladly welcome a different one. Who wouldn't want a more constructive discussion? But the Liberal Partisans are not interested, or capable, of this more admirable direction. They are still slandering the rationale, for using force to remove a monster named Saddam, even when they voted for it.
This poster firmly believes in the aggressive rebuke of terrorists. Even advocated for a greater confrontation of the Islamic Community to confront the insane, oppressive, violence being fostered within their ranks.
How can I not have the same conviction at home in the domestic arena? We must strongly oppose any unethical effort to slander those serving our political interest, especially when it weakens the security of the American Public.
If the Clinton Negligence were more vigirously challenged in our past, we may have been more prepared to deal with the threats we face today. Thus, aggressively opposing the same corrupt offerings presented now, can aid Our Nation for the future.
On the other hand, the MSM should listen to the concerns of viewers, and begin to ask the serious questions the American Public desires. Congratulations to Mr. Wallace and Fox News for empowering their audience for this exchange. Another cushy opportunity for a corrupt politician, to promote his agenda, turned into journalism.
Besides, the ratings boom for Fox News Sunday must be enormous. Perhaps other Media Outlets, may begin to ask Hillary and Bill some real questions as well. Will Katie someday ask Hillary, why the Clintons lied about the Genocide in Rwanda, for a ratings boost?
Yes, it seems Democrats have embraced the Liberal obsession, hoping to 'blame' President Bush again, in another desperate campaign effort.
The Democrat Election Strategy on full display. The pattern is familar. Once again, the NY Times begins slanting a leak of a probable classified report, in an attempt to sway public opinion. Isn't it ironic, the implication mimics the current expression of the Democrat Party?
One has to question, the potential of this being another organized Liberal Partisan effort, to promote baseless rumor intending to undermine the current Administration. Espeically with the timing of the leak, so close to November.
Democrats used to say, terrorism is a 'nuisance'. Many Liberals claimed the Bush Administration plays the politics of fear, trying to scare the American Public with a threat that does not exist.
The incredible News Busters has the transcript of the interesting interview with Bill Clinton. Apparently, Liberals are already mobilizing to discredit the taping before it airs.
The conversation is truly amusing. Bill remains a dishonest egotist.
It seems Mr. Wallace's inspiration for the question, which caused Bill Clinton to lose his dreary temper, originated from the viewing public. Evidence, most Americans want serious questions asked, which are often ignored by the biased Media. Maybe, a reporter will someday ask Mr. Clinton, what Sandy Berger hid down his pants?
Having Americans reminded of the Clinton negligence from the past, failing to address serious threats prior to 9-11, enabling problems with inept weakness and appeasement, is a serious problem for Democrats with November looming.
The Democrat Partisans have been promoting a silly political message, the disastrous Clinton effort was better for Americans. As if the threat of Islamic Radical Terrorism could simply go away, if ignored, appeased, or embraced. Like John Kerry's effort in 2003, Liberal Democrats often advocate returning to the dangerous denial of the 1990's.
Some Democrats these days, actually blame President Bush for Muslim Radical Militancy, with generic accusations of 'growing terrorism around the World'. They have tried to obstruct essential measures, which have protected Americans from attack ever since 9-11. The Democrat Party has attempted to 'kill' the Patriot Act, close Gitmo, block interrogations and surveillance of terrorists, even undermine the admirable Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Now, Bill Clinton is personally offering an admonition, a sincere warning against this foolishness with his conceited presence.
UPDATE: First Impression? Worse than previously imagined...
Liberals are losing elections, so they hope to change the rules...
This tiresome minority works to push their agenda upon us all, to force someone as malfeasant as Hillary Clinton into the White House. Whether it be illegal immigrants, felons, or the deceased voting, the Democrat Partisans could care less about the unethical means used, to empower their desperate agenda.
Now, they hope to wreck Our historic Electoral College, which wisely guarantees a voice for all Americans, in a Federal Election. Thus, keeping this tremendous Republic together, Our fine Nation unified.
This incredible Union which provided Civil Rights, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Women's Liberty, Historic Opportunity, etc., is now threatened by the self serving negligence of a few...
Perhaps, Mr. Chavez has experienced some truly bad dreams lately. Dr. Freud may have enjoyed diagnosing this demagogue. Is guilt driving his dementia? Self destructive behavior is often equated with a low self-esteem, and this Marxist is playing with fire.
Could Hugo be insecure? Did Saddam's incarceration, give this autocrat something to worry about? Or maybe the tyrant from Venezuela was attracted to the death of Zarqawi? Does he find his own elimination desirable? Is Chavez longing for his own mortality? Did the fool sign treaties with 'brother' Iran, because of a death wish?
Hillary voted and advocated for 'Operation Iraqi Freedom', the major objection Lamont is using to run againt Sen. Lieberman. It was a calculated position, to improve Ms. Rodham's extremely weak reputation on National Security.
Sadly, there are Liberal Democrats who love this dementia.
But this proud American, knows the mighty USA, will continue to provide freedom, opportunity, justice, security, and hope for this World, until the very end of time. While Hugo returns to the dust heap of history, providing food for worms.
One has to wonder, if the People of Venezuela are fully aware of the self destructive insanity they have empowered.
The Media originally misrepresented Pope Benedict's expression, when this facade of a tempest began. Now, many MSM efforts have improperly portrayed the Pope's remarks again today.
This poster doesn't see this as some form of retreat, nor was the original offering an attack either. This is an ethical, serious Religious Leader trying to promote understanding, discourse, and peace.
Meanwhile, the Islamic Radicals continue to try to distract from the sick reality. Desperate to portray the Muslim Militant's violent madness as having some basis...
But the fanatical Islamist's screams, threats, and killings, only reiterates their own pathetic dementia. As well as the danger for all.
Many became 'alarmed' with the Israeli Incursion into Southern Lebanon. Several of this poster's favorite sources, embraced hysteria, jumping into the fog of battle. But, alarmists are never quite accurate.
We have watched an irrational negative perception, sway many since the Election of 2004. So many issues, have been overwhelmed by confusing emotions, losing all objectivity.
Mr. Charles Krauthammer was one of the many Conservative Pundits, this poster greatly appreciates, who was convinced the Israeli effort was a disaster. He intensely asserted, Israel had suffered a significant defeat. One may remember, Mr. Krauthammer had previously accepted MSM misrepresentations of the Katrina Tragedy.
Mr. Krauthammer once complained on the Fox News 'Special Report' program, President Bush's pre-declaration of a Disaster Area on the Southern Coast, was an overreaction to the incoming Hurricane. Later, he would mimic various 'drive by' hype, with an emotional rebuke of the Bush Administration as providing an inadequate response.
Everyone is human, everyone makes mistakes, and everyone has their bad days. To provide commentary on Television must be a sincere challenge. And using the Liberal Media as a source is treacherous.
However, it was odd to see such alarmist responses from so many Conservatives. Especially those in such high profile forums. The combat had not even ended in this Battle in Southern Lebanon, and many were convinced of a defeat without significant basis. This poster wanted to send these admired voices a very stiff drink, and strongly advise they leave the Beltway for a needed rest.
Why weren't those prepared for the predictable propaganda of the misleading Muslim Radical Militants? Those who would again fictionalize a fake victory, in attempt to deny reality? Have they forgotten about the manipulation in Janin? Pallywood?
But for many to blame the Bush Administration for the Israeli effort in Southern Lebanon, seemed entirely unfair. The Israeli Operation in Lebanon should have reminded all, how successful, resolved, strong the Bush Administration, the amazing US Armed Forces, and Allied Coalition truly are in Iraq.
It is not without irony, only a week or so ago on a broadcast of Special Report, Mr. Krauthammer changed his prior convictions entirely. After the fog settled, the mighty Mr. Krauthammer stated 'Hezbollah had lost this Mideast War Politically and Militarily..."
Regarding her support for this fine President, Mrs. Myers stated, "a lesser man would have crumbled".
Considering the horror of 9-11, and the overwhelming bias, slander, deceit, undermining this Man has encountered, Kitty's contention is without a doubt...
Socialism - Communism are oppressive systems. They give power to the few, cement economic classes, kill opportunity, destroy incentive, reduce essential freedoms, and lower the quality of life for all.
The Democrat Dependency Machine was sadly revealed in Louisiana, during the Hurricane Katrina tragedy. So pathetic was this example, the only thing the liberals apparently offered, was blame for others.
"She was a passenger on board American Airlines flight 77 when it was flown into the Pentagon in the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack. She had reported the hijacking to her husband twice by phone about 20 minutes before the plane hit the Pentagon. She was 45...
She had been scheduled to take a different flight, but cancelled and booked herself on that particular flight on that Tuesday in order to celebrate her husband's birthday on Monday, September 10. Her husband's birthday is actually September 11th."
Yet, her fine memory is often tarnished by ugly Left Wing Partisans. These Demented Liberals create insane conpiracy garbage, defying reality with Pathetic Denial and Nutty Delusions.
There are unethical people in the United States, who have tried to deny, hide, belittle the serious threat facing the Free World.
Many are weak, irresponsible, corrupt, power hungry fools, who will do and say anything to further themselves.
Some are so clouded by bigotry, they have decided to vilify, slander, and blame a sitting President for all the problems on this Planet.
Yet, every day we encounter shocking evidence, of this vivid attempt to conquer, enslave, and destroy. Whether it appears in the form of a suicide bomber, a hijacked plane used for mass murder, or the attempt to ban 'love songs' in a tiny African Country, the threat remains sincere.
Ironically, several years ago in Mogadishu, America's Bravest died fighting in the streets. The corrupt Clinton Administration denied our Military the appropriate firepower for a mission, leading to unecessary, painful losses of our Finest. Thus, the Clinton Negligence began to enable and encourage these monstrous Islamic Fanatics.
The fraudulent Clintons cannot be blamed for Islamic Terrorism. These killers are solely responsible for their reprehensible acts.
But this Great Nation and the Free World, cannot return to the naive, unprincipled, feeble, delusion provided by today's treacherous Liberal Democrat Party...
We cannot allow another 9-11 to ever happen again.
The overt denial of the threats facing the Free World, mimics the level of bigotry Liberal Democrats have for Conservative Republicans.
Perhaps a little 'psycobabble' is appropriate, to study today's unstable Liberal mind...
For example, when a Republican wins an election, the Liberal Democrat begins to claim it was stolen, without any basis. When Republicans wisely cut taxation to help everyone, Democrat Partisans shout 'conspiracy of the rich'. Etc...
Blocking the reality of the Terrorism which created 9-11, could be another subconscious attempt to justify the hatred for Republicans. President GW Bush is greatly appreciated by Conservatives for his strong defense of this Nation after 9-11. The dismissal by the Left, of one of the most tragic attacks on American Soil, could be an irrational way for Liberals to cope with this President's support.
By removing the true source (9-11), the Liberal Partisan can feel more at ease opposing the admirable endeavors initiated by this President. Believing there is no justification for the use of Force, the creation of the Patriot Act, the need for the NSA surveillance, etc., the Liberal Democrat can continue to vilify the Republican President without guilt.
Suddenly, the successful Operations in Afghanistan removing the tyranny of the Taliban, and the ouster of a mad Dictator in Iraq, can become a negative in the mind of the so-called 'progressive'. Essential measures required to destroy the serious threats facing the Free World, and protect the American Public, are viewed as another 'vast right wing conspiracy' for the troubled Liberal perception.
If they are able to construct a fantasy of 9-11, denying this horrid act by Muslim Radical Terrorists, Liberals are capable of anything.
Another reminder, why Democrats are simply hard to take seriously. They remind us of amateurs, who have become a parody of themselves. A comedic act, that produces more laughter everyday.
(An email inquired "what is that?") Thus... one can find the dreaded 'two headed snake' out East, which is quite confusing, because you simply cannot tell the difference between the head or the tail. This is often referred to as a 'Slick Rodham'.
Ms. Baxter from the Times UK, might actually be a comedian.
Hillary's advisors must feel being the Democrat frontrunner, the establishment's favorite, is hurting her poll data. Perhaps, they are trying to diminish Mrs. Clinton's ugly reputation, being the narcissist with the most obsessive self serving ambition. The idea Hillary would do anything for her 'Country' or her 'Party' is truly laughable.
Or, the reality is setting in, Mrs. Rodham Clinton will never be able to win in a National Election. Her negatives are simply overwhelming. So in another cowardly move, HRC decides to tire more Americans by going after weak prey, like Sen. Reid.
Years ago, this poster asked quite a few Democrats, why didn't Ms. Rodham run against President Bush in 2004? At the time, these Liberals were suggesting Hillary was marvelous, strong, caring, and would win the Presidency in a landslide.
It was an incredible amount of denial on display.
Mrs. Clinton (their self proclaimed 'hero') should have campaigned to save the World back then, as these Liberals hoped. Was her failure to run, a sign of weakness? Was she afraid? Or, was Hillary just stalling to find an easier opportunity to suit her own needs?
Regardless, if Democrats believe the unethical Hillary Clinton is a 'consensus-maker', they are in more trouble than previously imagined.
It is very similar, having Nancy Pelosi push Unions on everyone else, while refusing to use Union Labor in her own fancy Hotels.
Or the old Democrat standard, with John Kerry, Hillary Rodham, Teddy Kennedy, etc., desperate to raise everyone else's taxation, while they hide their money in various tax shelters.
